[helmholtz~] is probably more accurate and will show you all of the pitch fluctuations live. [sigmund~] with the argument "notes" is probably preferable, if you only want one simple value per note.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pkstone@ucdavis.edu" target="_blank">pkstone@ucdavis.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Katja,<br>
<br>
I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking object. I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!), but I'm wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance as to how it compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how it will do for tracking a fretless electric bass.<br>
<br>
It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your detailed page about it.<br>
<br>
<br>
Phil Stone<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/<u></u>listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>