dont know if I got how it works, but anyway, can you share the less hungry one? thanks<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/5/25 Simon Iten <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:itensimon@gmail.com" target="_blank">itensimon@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">but don't use it! the osc2 part is really cpu hungry in this form. i did a rewrite which is much easier and works better. however as said before the frequency-extraction is the same.<br>
<div><div class="im"><div>On May 25, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Simon Iten <<a href="mailto:itensimon@gmail.com" target="_blank">itensimon@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div class="im"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">
here is an old version. the interesting part is in the synth subpatch on the lower left side. it's messy but you get the idea. it's for a five string bass tuned e a d g c. the new version is on another laptop, but the frequency conversion is the same. it's a straight copy from the gr-300 principle.<div>
<br></div><div>cheers, simon</div><div><br></div><div></div></div></div><span><gr-300.pd></span><div><div class="h5"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><br><div><br></div><div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On May 25, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <<a href="mailto:porres@gmail.com" target="_blank">porres@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br><blockquote type="cite">sounds interesting, where is it?<div>cheers<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/2/14 Simon Iten <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:itensimon@gmail.com" target="_blank">itensimon@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
hi phil,<br>
<br>
what are you trying to do? do you need midi from your electric bass? or just a way to make a synth in pd?<br>
i ask because i built a gr-300 emulation for bass that works very well and with almost no latency. you can drive any oscillator within pd from that. it's all signalpath though.<br>
ideally you would use such a thing with a hexaphonic (or quadraphonic) pickup, because it's monophonic. but the same is true for helmholtz i guess.<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
<br>
simon<br>
<div><div><br>
On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone <<a href="mailto:pkstone@ucdavis.edu" target="_blank">pkstone@ucdavis.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi Katja,<br>
><br>
> I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking object. I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!), but I'm wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance as to how it compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how it will do for tracking a fretless electric bass.<br>
><br>
> It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your detailed page about it.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Phil Stone<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br>