<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:08 PM, András Murányi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:muranyia@gmail.com" target="_blank">muranyia@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Roman Haefeli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reduzent@gmail.com" target="_blank">reduzent@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:58 +0200, András Murányi wrote:<br>
> Hi List,<br>
><br>
><br>
> I've got used to putting my PC to sleep (aka hibernation) often<br>
> lately. Now there is this behaviour of Pd that when you leave a patch<br>
> open and put the computer to sleep, once it wakes up Pd will try to do<br>
> everything it missed while the computer was sleeping, so the CPU goes<br>
> 100% for quite a while. I suppose this is by design.<br>
><br>
> What I've just noticed using l2ork is that I had closed my patch<br>
> before hibernating (in order to avoid the CPU boost when waking up),<br>
> put the computer to sleep for a few hours, and when i woke it up,<br>
> surprisingly the 100% CPU boost still happened - with only the main<br>
> window and console open.<br>
><br>
> This makes me think some things are not destroyed properly when a<br>
> patch is closed.<br>
><br>
> Any thoughts appreciated...<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I've tested it out a bit, and IOhannes and Ivica are right: it's a cleanup problem, rather something else. (It happens also when there is and there was no patch open).<br>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>i mean NOT a cleanup problem<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>
</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>
<br>
</div></div>Does it help to toggle DSP off and on, when Pd is in this post-suspend<br>
mode? I had the impression it did, but I wasn't sure if it was just a<br>
coincident, that CPU usage stopped at the same moment.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Roman<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes! I was actually toggling DSP on and off, because I usually keep it off. When I switched it on, CPU usage instantly dropped to normal.<br></div><div>Seems like a symptom that is avoidable... <br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>András
</font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br></div></div>