<div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Phil Stone <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pkstone@ucdavis.edu" target="_blank">pkstone@ucdavis.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 7/29/13 1:01 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
In fact there are so many of the latter type of improvements that it's probably<br>
less work to port Pd-l2ork to Windows and OSX than it is to put those features<br>
back into Pd-Extended and Vanilla. If Pd-l2ork incorporated the 0.43 gui changes<br>
then that's probably what I'd spend my time doing. :)<br>
<br>
-Jonathan<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Speaking strictly selfishly, that would be a dream-come-true for me. I'd love to see the fork reunite, as it sounds like many excellent improvements have been made in Pd-l2ork that would be nice to have become mainstream.<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
Phil Stone<br>
<a href="http://www.pkstonemusic.com" target="_blank">www.pkstonemusic.com</a></font></span><div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div><br>+1<br></div>huh :o}<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>András
</div></div></div>