<div dir="ltr">Yet again, many thanks for the walkthrough IOhannes, loads of good info in there, esp like the portaudio stuff.<div><br></div><div>And apologies again for the not refreshing problem (too early in the morning to have my brain refreshed).</div>
<div><br></div><div>If only there was a 'mentalconfig' command to go with ldconfig.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 October 2013 11:17, IOhannes m zmölnig <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at" target="_blank">zmoelnig@iem.at</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 2013-10-14 06:22, Julian Brooks wrote:<br>
> Hey again,<br>
><br>
> Possible issue:<br>
><br>
> I've installed libjack-dev and Pd builds fine - great.<br>
><br>
> I did want to have jackd2 but that doesn't have libjack-dev it has<br>
> libjack-jackd2-0.<br>
><br>
> Pd doesn't configure with jack when this lib is installed.<br>
><br>
> Does it make a difference to build Pd with libjack-dev (in effect build<br>
> with jackd1 but run with jackd2)? I mean I guess I'll know if it's<br>
> something obvious but could there be performance issues.<br>
<br>
</div>this is the preferred debian way: build against libjack-dev, and let the<br>
user decide to install jack1 or jack2.<br>
this is possible because the libraries are binary compatible.<br>
if they are not, it's a bug in debian.<br>
<br>
gfmrdsa<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">IOhannes<br>
<br>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>