<div dir="ltr">martin, I have not tried the moog but did use one of your abstractions using the fexpr~ as a starting point to build the original dsp cookbook filters(frequency thats where its happenin man) , I had been wanting to hear them in realtime since 1998 or so. I'm not sure I have them in there correct as they are over resonant but make a nice oscillator for drums if properly limited.<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:33 AM, martin brinkmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mnb@martin-brinkmann.de" target="_blank">mnb@martin-brinkmann.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 10/11/2013 08:32 AM, Dan Wilcox wrote:<br>
<br>
> [vcf~] sounds close, but of course, it's a band pass so it's not a real replacement.<br>
<br>
</div>the undocumented 2nd output of vcf~ is a lowpass. and there are a few<br>
methods to build the basic (cookbook) filters with pd-vanilla-objects:<br>
you could use fexpr~ to make your own signal-rate biquad. it works very<br>
well, but needs a lot more cpu than necessary. or you could use<br>
cpole~/czero~. like in the beequad-abstractions. i have used the same<br>
method in all my filters, with signal-rate. (in my "instruments<br>
collection" on my homepage). of course this is still not exactly<br>
moog~. it should be possible though to make a moog-abstraction<br>
in the same way, but i have not tried (yet)...<br>
maybe anyone else has already?<br>
<br>
bis denn!<br>
martin<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>