<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" id="owaParaStyle"></style>
</head>
<body fpstyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">What App Pall?<br>
<div><br>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px">
<div><font size="3"><i>Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A</i></font></div>
<div>Audio and Projection Design Faculty</div>
<div>Digital Worlds Institute</div>
<div>University of Florida, USA</div>
<div>(352)294-2020</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRpF153155" style="direction: ltr;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> pd-list-bounces@iem.at [pd-list-bounces@iem.at] on behalf of Pall Thayer [pallthay@gmail.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, February 09, 2014 7:53 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> pd-list<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [PD] Is open source better?<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">I'm giving a presentation this week. In a way, it's a counter argument to a recent presentation on Max/MSP. One of the things that I want to highlight is the "open sourceness" of PD. libpd presents a very good argument and I'll be highlighting
a project I was involved with that produced an IOS app that used libpd as the audio engine. Is there anything else I should be considering besides the obvious points of open source being open source. Concrete examples of PD's open sourceness trumping proprietary
technologies?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Pall<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
*****************************<br>
Pall Thayer<br>
artist<br>
<a href="http://pallthayer.dyndns.org" target="_blank">http://pallthayer.dyndns.org</a><br>
***************************** </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>