<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/23/2014 08:15 PM, Ivica Bukvic
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJrgGbaqDo8pikzjdSbMANakLrcoDRmL-D70o4zXFsCLqxe0rg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Dan
Wilcox <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:danomatika@gmail.com" target="_blank">danomatika@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="">On Feb 23, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Jonathan
Wilkes <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div>
<div class=""><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="">
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>Yeah, stuff like that we should be able to solve.
I'm not for ditching the Tcl/Tk gui at all. The work
you and Ivica have been doing seems to be going a
long way to fix this. Great! I just really hope this
goes back into vanilla somehow or can be split up
into between libpd and a gui implementation, etc.
Otherwise, I fear a return to DD.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I may chime in for a sec (pd-l2ork author here),
there is absolutely no interest in dropping development of
pd-l2ork anytime soon. Pd-L2Ork already has thousands of
lines of code either altered or added and I have no
intention of slowing down. Likewise, in part because I
tried in the past, I have no interest in trying to get
things merged into the core pd. I will very much welcome
someone else's efforts to do so but knowing Miller's
gargantuan goal of keeping backwards compatibility, I
simply feel this approach is too time consuming for me to
promote the rate of development I (and as it appears many
others on this list) desire.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Additionally, DesireData never had any stable releases as far as I
remember. matju may have used it for some of his projects, but when
I played around with it there were major chunks of functionality
missing, and easy crashes.<br>
<br>
If someone wanted to port over DD's keyboard-only patching feature
to Pd-l2ork, for example, you'd very quickly see the difference
between the two. Because once it makes it into a release you'd be
using the feature in a piece of stable software. That's an enormous
difference.<br>
<br>
-Jonathan<br>
</body>
</html>