<div dir="ltr">that's great to know, thanks!<br><br>Let me just see if I get a bit of the theory. Can I get [vcf~] with just one [cpole~] object and the right coeficients?<div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-04-12 13:36 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:msp@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">msp@ucsd.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
They're quite different. bp~ is the cheapest possible bandpass filter<br>
(as far as I know). vcf~ is a one-pole complex filter whose outputs are<br>
the real and imaginry parts. The real part may be used as a resonant<br>
bandpass filter and the imaginary as a resonant low-pass filter, but<br>
they can be combined to make other possibilities.<br>
<br>
It's possible to graph their frequency responses using the help patch<br>
"H10.measurement.pd' in 3.audio.examples.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
Miller<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 04:28:11AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:<br>
> Hi there, who can confirm that both [bp~] and [vcf~] are exactly the really<br>
> same thingy? The code looks quite different...<br>
><br>
> Moreover, why the two outlets for vcf~? Help doesn't say anything.<br>
><br>
> Thanks<br>
<br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> <a href="mailto:Pd-list@iem.at">Pd-list@iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>