<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>That neuro thing sounds very interesting!</div><div><br></div><div>Concerning antescofo: I've only gotten it to work on predefined music, and I'm getting the impression you want a general purpose tempo tracker, right?</div><div><br></div><div>I finally made my own, heavily based on an existing patch, and my version also tracks phase:</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); -webkit-text-size-adjust: none; "><a href="http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-8445-predicting-future-causes-dropouts">http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-8445-predicting-future-causes-dropouts</a></span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>It's far from perfect, but since you can help it along with manual tap tempo, I think it has an edge on the other trackers I've tried.</div><div><br></div><div>The forum post is about dropouts, but those are caused by the chord prediction part of the patch, which you don't need. </div><div><br></div><div>Best of luck,</div><div><br></div><div>Bart. </div><div><br></div><div><br>On 22 mei 2014, at 12:00, <a href="mailto:pd-list-request@lists.iem.at">pd-list-request@lists.iem.at</a> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><span>Hey, Rama!</span><br><span></span><br><span>I just saw a very impressive thing by Ed Large (a neuro-science guy from </span><br><span>UCONN). He models neuron oscillations with coupled nonlinear equations </span><br><span>and with this he gets really nice spikes at the pulse tempo even with </span><br><span>signals that don't have any onsets on the beat.</span><br><span></span><br><span>He said the model will be available in a month or so and the paper is </span><br><span>still under review. The other thing is that there is a training layer </span><br><span>(also neuro-model motivated) that you have to warm the thing up with, </span><br><span>but my impression is that you only have to do this once and then it is </span><br><span>ready to go. It's worth keeping an eye on for beat tracking solutions.</span><br><span></span><br><span></span><br><span>On 05/20/2014 07:32 PM, Rama Gottfried wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>Hi Peiman,</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>maybe check out antescofo~, there’s a pd version here: </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><a href="http://forumnet.ircam.fr/shop/en/forumnet/44-antescofo.html">http://forumnet.ircam.fr/shop/en/forumnet/44-antescofo.html</a></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>I’m sure there are ways to patch this as well, but antescofo~ makes </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>use of some nice HMM tricks to anticipate when you’re going to play next.</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>best,</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Rama</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>On May 20, 2014, at 12:36 PM, peiman khosravi </span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span><<a href="mailto:peimankhosravi@gmail.com">peimankhosravi@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:peimankhosravi@gmail.com">mailto:peimankhosravi@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Hello everyone,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>I am in serious need of advice! Here is what I need:</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>I need to compare a click-track with the input from a live midi </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>sequence (played on a midi drum pad) and slow down or speed up the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>click track to match the tempo of the live midi input. So I need to </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>generate a speed factor that will change dynamically to keep the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>click track in sync with the live sequence. The problem is that the </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>two need to stay in phase so a simple tempo follower won't work.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>It's more complex that I'd initially though it would be. Any </span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>suggestions?</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Many thanks in advance</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Peiman</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></body></html>