<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Hi list,</div><div> I've got a nice collection of new drawing commands in Pd-l2ork for drawing scalars that are (mostly) based on the svg spec from HTML5. Currently they are named [draw $shape], where $shape can be an svg shape, path, or also some higher-level convenience command like a sprite. (There is also [group] for svg groups, which should probably be [draw group].) Arguments set the initial coordinate data, like [draw line 0 0 40 40], but coords and attributes like color/opacity/transform can also be set and/or changed by sending messages to the object.<br></div><div><br></div>What do people think of this kind of two word naming scheme, as compared to Pd Vanilla's where the name of the shape is in the selector like [drawcurve] or
[drawpolygon]? I don't usually like the two word naming scheme, like the [list] objects. But in this case, the object interface is the same no matter what shape is chosen. (Nearly because [draw sprite] has a method for setting the index.) So everything really is one class called "draw", and the shape-- though it cannot be changed after instantiation-- is data that determines how to interpret the rest of the args plus any attributes set by sending messages.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Jonathan<br></div></body></html>