<div dir="ltr">really excited about the 0.5 version on the way :) thanks<div><br></div><div>will definitely try this and let you know</div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-11-06 14:50 GMT-02:00 Shahrokh Yadegari <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdy@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">sdy@ucsd.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Alexandre, (and all)<div><br></div><div>Attached is a pre Version 0.5 expr~.d_fat compiled on OSX 10.9.5 with some fixes. I have fixed a number of the bugs, which are listed on the attached modified pd patch Alexandre sent me. I am still working on the others, but I thought I send this intermediate version to you to test if you had the time, before I pass the sources to Miller.</div><div><br></div><div>I am not sure if I have picked the best way to fix the functions that were supposed to receive one argument, but were listed as needing two, or vice versa. My impetus was to fix and drop the erroneous version which would break any patch that has used them in the wrong format. I think it is better to break the patches and inform the author of the new change. Most likely, the original use did not behave as it should have any way, and it is better to fix the patch.</div><div><br></div><div>I would be happy to hear from any experiences.</div><div><br></div><div>best,</div><div>Shahrokh</div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Shahrokh Yadegari <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdy@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">sdy@ucsd.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Thanks Alexandre. I will be in touch soon with new objects.<div><br></div><div>best,</div><div>Shahrokh</div><div><br></div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:porres@gmail.com" target="_blank">porres@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">sure, count me in for testing it, my pleasure ;)<div><br></div><div>I'm on a mac os - yosemite and mavericks</div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-09-08 21:22 GMT-03:00 Shahrokh Yadegari <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdy@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">sdy@ucsd.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Alexandre,<div><br></div><div>I recall that I fixed this bug a while back so I am surprised that I see it again.</div><div><br></div><div>In any case your email is timely as I just started looking at the bugs and hope to be submitting new sources soon.</div><div><br></div><div>Would you care to be my alpha tester? If so, what environment are you on? (mac, linux, sorry I cannot deal with windows)</div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>Shahrokh</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:porres@gmail.com" target="_blank">porres@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">So, as it seems, I just found that there's an issue with the way [fexpr~] abbreviates the formulas and the way it behaves.<div><br></div><div>If you use it like this [fexpr~ ($x + $x[-1] + $x[-2] + $x[-3]) * 0.25] by supressing the outlet number, it won't check back on previous block sample values.</div><div><br></div><div>but if you do this [fexpr~ ($x1 + $x1[-1] + $x1[-2] + $x1[-3]) * 0.25] it will!</div><div><br></div><div>check attached patch</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, still seems like a bug to me one way or another that needs to be fixed. And, as long as we're on the subject, how's the work on the previous bug reports?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks<br></div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-09-08 1:47 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:porres@gmail.com" target="_blank">porres@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi Shahrokh and Pd list</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I've been testing fexpr~ and it seems it won't get the previous samples from the previous block.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">For example, a simple mean filter like this:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">[fexpr~ ($x + $x[-1]) * 0.5]<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">will not work for the first sample of the block, because it won't get the last sample from the previous block.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">So, I know that in practice it doesn't compromise much, it's just one sample, but in an 16 point average filter this becomes more of a concern. One way or another, even for just one sample, I consider this problematic and a bug, as it should always be able to address previous samples. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Am I right?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">thanks</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr">Shahrokh Yadegari<br>Professor of Composition and Sound Design,<br>Theatre and Dance Department<br>University of California, San Diego<br>Director, Initiative for Digital Exploration of Arts and Science, (IDEAS)<br>California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technologies (Calit2)<br>Email: <a href="mailto:sdy@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">sdy@ucsd.edu</a><br>Web: <a href="http://yadegari.org" target="_blank">http://yadegari.org</a><br>Tel: (858) 822-4113<br>Fax: (858) 534-1080<br><br></div></div>
</font></span></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>