<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">How fine-grained does it need to be? As long as all the parameters are known at the beginning of the block, you have everything you need. As far as human interaction is concerned, 64-sample blocks are extremely fine-grained. The individual cycles of the pitches at the beginning of Beethoven's 5th are coarser grained. For computer generated events, there are ways to schedule events to begin in the middle of a block.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">The idea of a kind of Pd JIT compiler is interesting, though.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Brian Fay <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ovaltinevortex@gmail.com" target="_blank">ovaltinevortex@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">The issue with blocking is that you don't have fine-grained control of an audio, process, right? If you want that level of fine-grained control, you either need to explicitly set the blocksize to 1 in your patch/sub-patch, or you need to actually dig into the C code for the externals and change the logic there (which requires you write C code, recompile things, restart Pd...).<div><br></div><div>Theoretically, there could be a way to swap out the code for an external while Pd is running, rather than restarting Pd. Still, you'd have to write C and pray that you didn't introduce some terrible bug.</div><div><br></div><div>But theoretically, instead of writing externals in C, couldn't we come up with a high-level representation of a Pd external in a visual programming environment similar to Pd? Then we could compile that down to an external, and actually use it in our Pd patch, without actually reloading Pd. It sounds very difficult, but I imagine gen~ does something like that.<br><div><br></div><div>For reference, I believe Extempore provides the ability to edit and replace a low-level audio process while the program is running (I'll have to rewatch some conference videos to confirm that). </div></div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Matt Barber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brbrofsvl@gmail.com" target="_blank">brbrofsvl@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">OK, now I'm having trouble even imagining how an unblocked audio model could possibly behave (at least, as David points out, in a real-time context).</div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:58 PM, David Medine <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmedine@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">dmedine@ucsd.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
This doesn't answer Matt's question at all (apologies), but just as
a clarification, ChucK <i>does </i>block audio. It's just that
ChucK always blocks at the minimum size of 1 sample per block. 1 is
still a block size though, and it still implies the same problems
associated with order of operations, feedback, interpolating control
input, and parallelization that a block size of 64 does. <br>
<br>
Also, maybe this has already been pointed out on this thread, but
block 1 is super slow because it means that you have to load all
your DSP functions onto the CPU cache every 1/SR seconds instead of
64/SR seconds. Blocking by 64 buys a lot. Having a locally
adjustable block size is a great feature (that ChucK lacks) because
you can do it for special needs cases (like variable delay patches,
for example).<br>
<br>
Anyway, in my opinion, the block thing isn't a limit to Pd, but a
limit to real-time digital signal processing.<div><div><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 2/24/2016 11:27 AM, Matt Barber
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Are there any other DSP
environments besides ChucK that don't block audio? Last time I
tried ChucK (2012?) its efficiency was still abysmal. [block~
1] definitely takes a hit, but it's usually possible to
minimize how much of the DSP chain is actually blocked at 1. I
guess with Csound you can specify a k-rate equal to the sample
rate which is also effectively a single sample block. I
haven't ever used Csound in a real-time context, and most of
what I do with it compiles much more slowly than real time in
any case.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:44 PM, peiman
khosravi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peimankhosravi@gmail.com" target="_blank">peimankhosravi@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">You can
do this with MSP's poly~ too but I'm guessing that the
CPU costs are quite heavy. Moreover, there are operators
in gen that are designed for low-level operations. <br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><font size="2" face="comic sans ms,
sans-serif"><b><a href="http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk" target="_blank">www.peimankhosravi.co.uk</a>
</b></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 24 February 2016 at 16:15,
cyrille henry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ch@chnry.net" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:ch@chnry.net" target="_blank">ch@chnry.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
<br>
Le 24/02/2016 16:50, peiman khosravi a écrit :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
One great advantage of maxmsp is gen, which
gives you sample-level patching with the
possibility of a one-sample delay.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</span>
you can use [block~ 1 1 1] in a pd subpatch.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
c<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
P<span><br>
<br>
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Samuel Burt
<<a href="mailto:composer.samuel.burt@gmail.com" target="_blank">composer.samuel.burt@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:composer.samuel.burt@gmail.com" target="_blank">composer.samuel.burt@gmail.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
David,<br>
<br>
One thing I attempted and couldn't find a
solution for was the following, mostly owing
to the limitation of interfacing with a 64
sample block size.<br>
<br>
I wanted to have a directory of hundreds
of audio recordings. Each one would be a
single wavelength from an interesting sound,
like a bass clarinet, marimba, harpsichord,
tambourine, etc. Each would begin and end at a
zero crossing so you could chain them together
to make complex timbres. They could be chained
in sequence, randomized, or loaded in
meta-data-matched chunks. I ran into a problem
figuring out how to trigger the next sound
based on the ending of the last sound in a
sample accurate way. Sound file loading or
even buffer playback triggering waits until
the start of the next block size before it
updates. If you have a waveform that lasts 205
samples (64+64+64+13), you have a gap of 51
silent samples before the next waveform would
start. Not only do you not get the continuous
sound you want, this winds up creating a
periodic pattern with a frequency of 689 Hz
(44100/64).<br>
<br>
David, I like your idea "what (if
anything) someone tried to do in Pd, but
couldn't given its limitations". I think this
could be a wonderful challenge if we could
have a monthly thread like this where the best
minds among us come up with solutions to some
of the hardest conceptual challenges in Pd.<br>
<br>
I'm still struggling with loading dozens
of files, audio dropouts, and other similar
problems. Someone else expressed frustration
about Pd's single-threaded status. I too have
feared upgrading my computer based on the
limitations of current multicore processors
(although realistically I think we can all
look at the "turbo-boost" level or whatever
Intel calls it to determine where our
processor might run with a demanding patch. I
understand the fact that you can't run your
audio process on multiple cores, because it is
a linear process. It would be great if the GUI
could run on a second core, a process that
loads audio into memory could run on third
core, while GEM could automatically run on a
fourth core. I don't have any concept of how
feasible that would be, though. Does the GUI
in pd-l2orc run on a separate core?<br>
<br>
Sam<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:01:06 -0800<br>
</span>
From: david medine <<a href="mailto:dmedine@ucsd.edu" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:dmedine@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">dmedine@ucsd.edu</a>
<<a>javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml</a>','<a href="mailto:dmedine@ucsd.edu" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:dmedine@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">dmedine@ucsd.edu</a>');>><span><br>
<br>
One thing I'd be interested in knowing
about is what (if anything)<br>
someone tried to do in Pd, but
couldn't given its limitations (apart<br>
from look/feel/convenience issues).<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
</span>
*<a href="http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.peimankhosravi.co.uk</a>
<<a href="http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk</a>>
<<a href="http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss</a>><<a href="http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/</a>>*<span><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a>
mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
</span></blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a>
mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a>
mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at" target="_blank">Pd-list@lists.iem.at</a> mailing list<br>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> <a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>