<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEAsFmjf8HYPQcakOhMcOrnYkO77dOTfj5jrQBOo_2jjpGKj0w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Em sex., 26 de nov. de 2021 às 20:19, João Pais
<<a href="mailto:jmmmpais@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">jmmmpais@gmail.com</a>>
escreveu:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I don't see a mention to
these messages: mouse, mouseup, mousedown, <br>
relocate. And also all other messages related to gui stuff.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>yeah, I didn't put it. It felt like something hard to
document and for more extreme cases. And now that Christof
says I should really keep out of this dark corner, I wonder
if I did right. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't remember now exactly why these methods are "dangerous"
and "unofficial" (it was discussed already a lot in the list
anyway), but I've been using them for more than 15 years with no
big issues. If any of these methods is cut, then my patches won't
work anymore - hopefully someone else's as well.<br>
</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEAsFmjf8HYPQcakOhMcOrnYkO77dOTfj5jrQBOo_2jjpGKj0w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
It could also be clearly mentioned that subpatches receive
messages sent <br>
to pd-[subpatch], and abstractions are named
[abstraction].pd (if I'm <br>
recalling correctly) - unless there is a namecanvas used in
those.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>how isn't it clearly mentioned?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The first one is mentioned in [pd Dynamic-Patching], although it
might be easier to understand if there is an example immediately
under the text. But there are enough examples of [s pd-xxxx] in
the patch anyway to deduce it.</p>
<p>The second isn't mentioned at all, the search results for
"abstraction" and ".pd" return elements in other types of
contexts.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>