<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-forward-container">Generating and displaying many
structs can be very slow, it might not be the most efficient way.
Not sure internally if it's better to bang~ a whole table, or find
a method to go not so fast. Anyway, when generating structs, it
will help if the window where they will be drawn is closed.<br>
<p>I think the eargram library had already a sonogram also based
on data structures, probably using timbreId.</p>
<p>I also did some own improvements to the partial tracer file
(for both analysis and synthesis), there were some small
bugs/incoherences there: (not sure if this picture will show in
the list)<br>
</p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.SmII7qbN.hl87YSTu@gmail.com" alt=""
class=""></p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEAsFmiqx3EympWx5ZofrsnTcW1NQiM0pkEHoNe+Pv7t=Xr5CA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I wanted to implement a sonogram analysis like
max's spectroscope~ does (see picture) with FFT analysis and
data structures. Any ideas? I guess I can [fft~] connected to
a [tabsend~] and then have a [bang~] reading the table values
for generating the graph, that's my first guess.
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> But I am also now inspired by partialtracer.pd from
the data structures tutorial, which uses [sigmund~] and
it'd be great if it had a new output mode for raw FFT
amplitudes, I am assuming that the 'peaks' output doesn't
really work for this, or would it?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>