Preferred Pd platforms

[antiorp at tezcat.com]

>hu.
>and the fool's opinion:

paz vra!ment _ !t = 1 !ntell!gent opinion


>of course it helps a lot if you already know max, but then, its not
>impossible to get into pd without it.

!t != !mposz!bl + !t = dz!rabl. z!multaneouz konverzat!on.


>trial&error is supported pretty good with the way pd works,

et natur auss!


>i think.
    \
     <  = dez!rabl


>> >
>> > - How similar is Pd to MAX?  If I get the book on MAX
>> > programming, will this be an aid to learning Pd?



dze book on `max programm!ng`
[!f 1 = w!shez 2 name tag !t dzat _ 1 mor aprop name tag = bkom!ng 1
z!metrkl kap!tal!zt]
= 1 ultra lo.tekk d!zpla! ov m!t korporat !nkompetensz. negat!on++



>>   IMHO, it would be very difficult to learn Pd without knowing MAX right
>> now.


relat!vl! kom!kl


>>This is starting to change due to some tutorials and help docs,
>> but there isn't too much right now.  A book on MAX programming probably
>> won't help, because it won't cover the audio objects, GEM, etc. and will
>> probably focus on a lot of objects which don't exist in Pd.  If you can
>> get Chris Dobrian's (sp?) Max/FTS tutorial, then that is probably the
>> best bet.


onl! dzat wh!ch 1 != undrztand = worth undrztand!ng
!t = un4tunat humanz zukc++








                                        ||
                                      ||9||
[p-un_kT-pr_o-T–k_oL] Ø f Ø Ø Ø 3       ||
                 herausgegeben vøm !nternat!onalen
!nst!tut f:ur ordnung |+| d!sz!pl!n
       : / / m9ndfukc.com

                                                    e
                                                    |
                                                     |  +----------
                                                    |  |
                                   \\----------------+  |
                                                       |
                                                       e