[PD]

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

Ulrich Kehrer <ulrich at konsum.net>

>hi johannes & list,


hou do u do kr!!!!ket

>an object for pixel-processing digital video like mov, mpeg, avi,... would
>be very nice especially in conjunction with pix_dump/pix_set.
>
>concerning the naming issue pix_digitalvideo comes to my mind which is too
>long of course. pix_dv is short enough but DV is already taken in the
>global game of brand names (on the other hand...why care about it?). a
>compromise would be pix_digvid.
>
>
>another great object would be one that can talk IEEE 1394. is it
>possible to route the gemwin to a firewire-port?
>imagine putting out gem-work to a dv-recorder or a projector with a
>pix_1394 object...


imagine nato.0+55 does all ov these things+
4 over 1 year.

de\monstrating further the inferiority of
xy kr!!!!!ketz + gov sponsored okzident mafiosi in general.


nn



                         n
                                             n      n
 
                                       n
                             n      n
                                                  v3kt0r.r2!n - ztra!ng !n 2 dze z!ngular!t!
 
 
 
-
 
Netochka Nezvanova    - karesz!ng dze vektor!szd 4th d!menz!on.
f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST   desire free.
@www.eusocial.com
17.hzV.tRL.478
                                                      e
                                                      |
                                                       |  +----------
                                                      |  |     <
                                     \\----------------+  |  n2t
                                                         |       >
                                                         e