[GEM-dev] rc3 thoughts

[chris clepper]

>> - I'm really starting to be against naming this "0.888":  we've worked
>>
>> the above mentioned), surely we're at v1.0?
>
> well, as i have said before, i am afraid of "1.0"
> anyhow, if all (or most) of the developers prefer v1.0 then we should 
> just make it.
> so chris, daniel, günter ?

I actually don't really care much about the version number as long as 
there is some sort of official release that we can point people to and 
say 'use this'.

That being said, I think we could keep the <1.0 numbers if we plan to 
do much more frequent releases.  If we decide that we can really only 
maintain a yearly or so release schedule then major release numbering 
starting with 1.0 makes more sense to me.  I don't think very many 
people care about the versioning these days anyway - in fact maybe only 
one person has asked me if 'GEM will ever get out of beta'.

cgc