[GEM-dev] rc3 thoughts

[James Tittle II]

On Apr 8, 2004, at 4:46 AM, guenter geiger wrote:
> To give a new proposal, I am for 0.90. This sounds at least a bit 
> stable
> and reflects the big step that gem has made after 0.87.

...I'm for 0.90 as much as 1.0:  I know they're arbitrary, especially 
without a release schedule...now after all these changes, I'll need a 
few days to go thru and make sure things still work ;-)

l8r,
jamie