[GEM-dev] pix_movie and pix_film and FTGL issues under linux

B. Bogart ben at ekran.org
Fri Apr 9 03:51:37 CEST 2004


Hey Johannes,

I am using nvidia with nvidia drivers 5328 with the glx headers that 
come with it.
(What driver version are you using?)

exactly how do I remove the optimization flags in the pd makefile? (just 
remove all the OPT_FLAGS?) or are there any flags I need to add?

Thanks!

Ben


zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:

>Zitiere "B. Bogart" <ben at ekran.org>:
>
>  
>
>>Hey linuxers,
>>
>>1"). Everything works except it will not texture the video frames.
>>    
>>
>
>hmm. i am sure i have asked a lot of times which gfx-card you use (and i am sure
>you have answered this quite often).
>anyhow *if* you are using an nvidia card try to install their openGL-headers
>(ships with the nvidia-glx-package) instead of the mesa-headers
>
>
>  
>
>>Also I can't get ftgl to work well, gem just crashes when I enable ftgl
>>and try 
>>and create a text3d object while the gemwin is created:
>>
>>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 10130)]
>>0x401181f9 in free () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
>>(gdb) where
>>#0  0x401181f9 in free () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
>>#1  0x40b5a0c1 in operator delete(void*) () from
>>/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
>>#2  0x40b5a11d in operator delete[](void*) () from
>>/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
>>#3  0x402ab841 in TextBase::~TextBase() ()
>>    from /home/bbogart/gem/gemcvs/Gem.pd_linux
>>#4  0x4031eb58 in text3d::~text3d() ()
>>    from /home/bbogart/gem/gemcvs/Gem.pd_linux
>>#5  0x4031ebb8 in text3d::obj_freeCallback(void*) ()
>>    from /home/bbogart/gem/gemcvs/Gem.pd_linux
>>#6  0x08094c8e in pd_free (x=0x81212d0) at m_pd.c:35
>>#7  0x081cfba8 in ?? ()
>>#8  0x081cfbac in ?? ()
>>#9  0x081128a8 in ?? ()
>>#10 0x081212d0 in ?? ()
>>
>>    
>>
>
>so still the same:
>what is puzzling me, is why pd tries to destroy the text3d object.
>why is the pd_free() called ?
>who is trying to call pd_free() ?
>could you compile pd with debugging-flags (or rather: without non-debugging and
>optimization flags) and tell us, what gdb thinks about the ?? functions ?
>
>
>mfg.a.sdr
>IOhannes
>
>
>  
>




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list