[GEM-dev] Next week?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

chris clepper wrote:
> On May 19, 2004, at 1:44 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> I got some clarification on this, and it's pix_kaleidoscope which has 
> all those inlets.  I think most objects have gone to sending messages to 
> the left inlet anyway, and that's just fine.  I've never liked the way 
> Pd handles object sizing and multiple inlets anyway.

i see your point (with 8 or more inlets - remembers me of zexy's 
matrix-objects with 24 inlets (or whatever) ;-))

> 
>> i do think that most (if not all) inlets are explained in the 
>> help-patches but i might be wrong here (damned, 2 days ago i walked 
>> through all of the help-patches to see whether they do work on a 
>> windos-machine with a crappy graphics card; it took hours - and i have 
>> to admit, it becomes rather boring after 30 minutes and my 
>> concentration went away)
> 
> 
> I did the same thing on a G5 and my AMD box this weekend.  I threw some 
> pmpd into the mix for entertainment.  I still laugh at the 'hollywood 
> explosion' patch.

let me share your amusement. i don't get a clue

> 
> 0888-r2 runs ok on my win2k box, although can you double check the 
> compilation settings?  A few things like pix_biquad ran slower than I 
> would have expected them too, and maybe the optimization settings aren't 
> maxed out.

the 0.888-rc2 has been compiled as Debug (no optimization) -  i have 
just forgotton to switch it to Release....

> 
> If Jamie has checked in the final halftone code then I think it's ready 
> to go.  We should work up some release notes while waiting for the builds.

alright

> 
> Also, I'm just going to post a G3, G4 and G5 build on my page and you 
> can either link to it from IEM or copy them to the local server.  My 
> server is on multiple 100 Mbit lines off the main backbone in the 
> midwest so there is no problem handling the load.
> 

ok.

mfg.asd.r
IOhannes