[GEM-dev] pf/pdp/3dp in Gem
Tom Schouten
doelie at zzz.kotnet.org
Wed Nov 24 11:29:40 CET 2004
> >since it's really only 'get' and 'set' (just about exchainging data
> >with a gem render chain) i think this should be clear in the name.
> >
> >the object qualify as 'gem chain objects' not pdp objects. so [pdp_xxx]
> >seems confusing.
>
> true.
> still i think that "pdp" should be in the name too, as [gem_set]
> wouldn't necessarily have something to do with pdp packages.
> so probably [gem_pdpout} and [gem_pdpin] would be more apropriate ?
> (or [gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in])
>
>
...
>
>
> so the templates are almost done; just want to settle the name before i
> check them in
>
[gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in] seem ok to me
or even
[out_pdp] and [in_pdp] to keep them shorter, since most gem
objects don't have a gem_ prefix.
yeah, politics!
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list