[GEM-dev] pf/pdp/3dp in Gem

[B. Bogart]

to match the convension of gem

pdp_in and pdp_out would be best

(since we have sub-chains with prefixes in gem, pix_ vertex_ etc.. )

B.

(I'm looking forward to play with this...)


>
>> >since it's really only 'get' and 'set' (just about exchainging data
>> >with a gem render chain) i think this should be clear in the name.
>> >
>> >the object qualify as 'gem chain objects' not pdp objects. so [pdp_xxx]
>> >seems confusing.
>>
>> true.
>> still i think that "pdp" should be in the name too, as [gem_set]
>> wouldn't necessarily have something to do with pdp packages.
>> so probably [gem_pdpout} and [gem_pdpin] would be more apropriate ?
>> (or [gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in])
>>
>>
> ...
>>
>>
>> so the templates are almost done; just want to settle the name before i
>> check them in
>>
>
>
> [gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in] seem ok to me
>
> or even
>
> [out_pdp] and [in_pdp] to keep them shorter, since most gem
> objects don't have a gem_ prefix.
>
> yeah, politics!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev
>