[GEM-dev] pf/pdp/3dp in Gem

[B. Bogart]

James inspired me,

gem2pdp and pdp2gem or pix2pdp and pdp2pix

:)

Ok this time I'm really going to shut up and go back to work.

B.


> ...now that IOhannes has committed something, I may as well start to
> discuss naming, too :-)
>
> On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:09 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
>
>> to match the convension of gem
>>
>> pdp_in and pdp_out would be best
>>
>> (since we have sub-chains with prefixes in gem, pix_ vertex_ etc.. )
>
> ...I think this holds to the general design of gem, too; but...
>
>>> [gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in] seem ok to me
>>>
>>> or even
>>>
>>> [out_pdp] and [in_pdp] to keep them shorter, since most gem
>>> objects don't have a gem_ prefix.
>
> ...I'm not sure that in and out are the best terms here? (although they
> aren't the worst, and make pretty good sense once ya see a patch)...
>
> How about something more like [gem_to_pdp] & [gem_from_pdp]?
>
> 2 cents 2 late,
> jamie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev
>