[GEM-dev] Re: [PD-dev] pdp2gem question

[Johannes M Zmoelnig]

james tittle wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2004, at 6:33 PM, Yves Degoyon wrote:
> 
>>>
>> congatulations, amigo.
> 
> 
> ...just glad to be able to move forward with what we talked about in 
> bergen!
> 

hi all.
sorry for cross-posting....

just for me to get an idea: what have you talked about in bergen ?

just a summary about the gem/pdp-bridge (most is just guessing)
[gem2pdp] and [pdp2gem] are there for quite some time (thanks yves)
[gem2pdp] is slow (as it needs to grab the render-buffer)
[gem2pdp] is somewhat clumsy as you need a gem-window even though you 
want to produce something in a pdp-window. (this is a problem of Gem)

the "other" idea (tom's) was, to be able to build include pdp-chains 
within gem-chains; this is: one library would be master, the other one 
would be slave, as opposed to the egaliterian "bridge"-solution. it 
might be easier to code if Gem was master (as a first step).

now how to avoid doubling of efforts ?

mfg.a.sdr
IOhannes