[GEM-dev] branches: SIMD & vertex-array going MAIN!
Johannes M Zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Dec 14 21:30:42 CET 2004
james tittle wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2004, at 10:27 AM, Johannes M Zmoelnig wrote:
>
> ...I think here he meant 3 is valid, but 4 is not...just the same as
> Index and colors have a certain size
but what for do we have the "stride"-argument then ??
>> while pixes are the bridge to pdp, i guess vertex-arrays might be the
>> bridge to GridFlow.
>
>
> ...wha? GridFlow doesn't know anything about 3d atm...sure, I can see
> use of gridflow's matrix manipulations: it could be really good for
yes, that is what i meant: GridFlow is about matrix-manipulation of
arrays (sorry matiu if this is wrong...) and vertex-arrays are too.
but it was just a wild idea.
> ...just to throw something else into the ring, I've been imagining a
> series of "[vp_*]"'s that would use vertex programs to manipulate data
> that is already on the card (in the somewhat the same manner as the
> [vertex_sub/add/whatever] stuff): then we don't have a choice of what
> format!
ah, so much things to do...
mfg.asd.r
IOhannes
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list