[GEM-dev] Re: [PD] gem & messaging

[chris clepper]

Perhaps I don't understand what you are trying to do, but why not use 
the GEM specific [separator] [pix_separator] objects?

Also, splitting a GEM chain without these objects will mean that each 
chain operates on the same set of data, so the pix_ data and GL states 
won't be unique to each.

On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:

> hi all ...
>
> i've got a problem with a simple gem patch that's related to the way 
> gem
> handles pixes ...
>
> my patch looks like this:
>
> pix_video
> |
> t a a
> |   |
> |   |do a
> |
> do b
>
> but the |do a| part changes the state of the picture ... this for the
> dataflow:
> although i should have the same message to work on (coming from
> pix_video), i'm working on two different messages ...
>
> for my taste, this doesn't follow the dataflow language of pd any more,
> since two messages that should have the same behaviour, behave
> different...
>
> any idea, how to solve that?
>
> cheers ... tim
>
> -- 
> mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de    ICQ: 96771783
> http://www.mokabar.tk
>
> After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
> would say "I want to see the manager."
> 				      William S. Burroughs
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>