[PD-dev] Re: [GEM-dev] Funny crash in pd/Gem

[B. Bogart]

Ah, I now remember chris's post.

Chris, could you send me a patch or commit your fix?

I have an example patch that indeed triggers some mess using separator,
since I don't see the crash without it. (well at least after an hour so far)

Thanks Erich,

B>

Erich Berger wrote:
> hi ben,
>
> i experienced something similar a while ago,
> and what i found out was that pd/gem slowly eats
> up memory after time.
> as i can remember wasnt there a few weeks ago something
> about a memory leak in "separator" ?
>
> have a look at your memory over time,
> maybe its related ...
>
> erich
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------
> http://randomseed.org
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, B. Bogart wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> After running my patch for about 2-3 hours it will suddently exit. This
>> could be related to some off issues I've been having with CPU usage, PD
>> using up 90% when it should be using more like 20%.
>>
>> What confuses me is that all gdb returns is:
>>
>> pd_gui: pd process exited
>> Couldn't get registers: No such process.
>> (gdb) where
>> Cannot fetch general-purpose registers for thread 1076267520: generic
>> error
>>
>> Is this a watchdog kill?
>>
>> Anyhow I'll try and pinpoint the cpu usage issue and see if that is the
>> cause.
>>
>> I'm running pd 0.38-4 on debian/sarge using the demudi packages.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> B>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20050823/19c64559/attachment.pgp>