[GEM-dev] TextBase class

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

hi


of course [l2s] wouldn't make much sense with a limited length of 
symbols (at least with so low limits).


IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> i think that [print] is a bad debugging tool for extreme symbols.
> 
> it would be better to look at the symbol within C.

and doing so, i have done symbols with 20000 characters without problems.

of course this (like [l2s]) will polute the symbol-hash and (what is 
more important) will add a memory-leak (as symbols that once appear in a 
pd-sessions will stay there forever)

so a string-type would really be nice.


mfg.asd.r
IOhannes

> 
> 
> mfg.asd.r
> IOhannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev