[GEM-dev] pix_image again ...

[B. Bogart]

10-40 sounds pretty small, video would be overkill. (and now I'm
convincing myself that the VCD does not seek properly... losing my mind...

b.

Georg Holzmann wrote:
> Hallo!
>
>> how many images are you working with?
>
> not much, only 2 as a static "background" (for this I would use
> pix_image) and then I have to load every 2 min. 10-40 images in a
> pix_buffer ...
>
> LG
> Georg
>
>>
>> I just spent two days figuring out how to make a seekable mpeg file from
>> a 100,000 jpegs. faster than pix_image, and less memory than pix_buffer
>> or pix_multimage.
>>
>> could work for you...
>>
>> b.
>>
>>
>>
>> Georg Holzmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hallo gem-devs!
>>>
>>> I also need pix_image now and so I wanted to ask, if I can remove the
>>> Cache from pix_image (because, as I discussed with IOhannes offline, it
>>> seems that there is the memory leak ...)
>>>
>>> Because if you need lots of picture you have now pix_buffer, so the
>>> Cache of pix_image is not needed anymore ...
>>>
>>> What do you think about that?
>>> (if you think it's no good I idea I will simply use pix_buffer or
>>> pix_multiimage, but ...)
>>>
>>> LG
>>> Georg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20050831/4635a811/attachment.pgp>