[GEM-dev] pix_image again ...

Georg Holzmann grhPD at gmx.at
Wed Aug 31 17:21:06 CEST 2005


Hallo!

> 10-40 sounds pretty small, video would be overkill. (and now I'm
> convincing myself that the VCD does not seek properly... losing my mind...
:)
anyway, in may cause it would not be possible with video, because the 
pictures are comming in realtime (and from database) from mobile phones ...

LG
Georg

> 
> b.
> 
> Georg Holzmann wrote:
> 
>> Hallo!
>>
>>> how many images are you working with?
>>
>>
>> not much, only 2 as a static "background" (for this I would use
>> pix_image) and then I have to load every 2 min. 10-40 images in a
>> pix_buffer ...
>>
>> LG
>> Georg
>>
>>>
>>> I just spent two days figuring out how to make a seekable mpeg file from
>>> a 100,000 jpegs. faster than pix_image, and less memory than pix_buffer
>>> or pix_multimage.
>>>
>>> could work for you...
>>>
>>> b.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Georg Holzmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hallo gem-devs!
>>>>
>>>> I also need pix_image now and so I wanted to ask, if I can remove the
>>>> Cache from pix_image (because, as I discussed with IOhannes offline, it
>>>> seems that there is the memory leak ...)
>>>>
>>>> Because if you need lots of picture you have now pix_buffer, so the
>>>> Cache of pix_image is not needed anymore ...
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about that?
>>>> (if you think it's no good I idea I will simply use pix_buffer or
>>>> pix_multiimage, but ...)
>>>>
>>>> LG
>>>> Georg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 
=%)!:?"§<§0&-"|>*
http://grh.mur.at




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list