IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > hi. > > if this is not feasible (because of more urgent matters) i would prefer > to name it "pix_recordQT", instead of naming the common api-object > "pix_recordNEW"; and put a HUGE "#warning" pragma into the source-file > so people get reminded that something needs to be done. > done for now. mfg.ad.s IOhannes