[GEM-dev] new win32 build

[B. Bogart]

Hi Chris,

Indeed that is the problem, I'm often putting different textures on
different subchains on a single gem-head (so I can control the render
order of them both as a single object.)

Short of the suggestion of push and pop matrix from Cyrille, and simply
not using separator and having pix_* and geo below where the chain
splits, what is the "proper" method of texturing two subchains seperatly?

Or worse, having one subchain get a texture from above the separator,
and a another subchain setting its own texture...

I apologize if it is already there, but I've still not seen any working
examples of a "clear" message to gemwin to give single-buffer-like
trails...?

I think now is a good time for a release indeed!

.b.

chris clepper wrote:
> On 3/9/06, *B. Bogart* <ben at ekran.org <mailto:ben at ekran.org>> wrote:
>
>     I would very much like this separator for texture coords thing fixed.
>     Either I get a memory leak or I have to remove separator and try and
>     figure out whats going on.
>
>
> The texture coordinates have to be created before other objects  can
> modify them.  pix_texture has to be first in the chain ahead of
> separator and pix_coordinate.  I use separator with switching the gem
> chains around and avoid the leak.  We could perhaps fix the number of
> texture coordinates to four and have the gemhead create them and never
> destroy them until the gemhead destructor.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20060309/5ab65fca/attachment.pgp>