[GEM-dev] Re: [GEM-cvs] Gem/src/Base GemPixConvertAltivec.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvert.h, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixUtil.cpp, 1.48, 1.49 GemPixUtil.h, 1.46, 1.47
james tittle
tigital at mac.com
Wed Mar 22 21:40:24 CET 2006
- Previous message: [GEM-dev] Re: [GEM-cvs] Gem/src/Base GemPixConvertAltivec.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvert.h, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixUtil.cpp, 1.48, 1.49 GemPixUtil.h, 1.46, 1.47
- Next message: [GEM-dev] GemPixConvert.h
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:22 PM, james tittle wrote:
> How should we now require header inclusion to use this? Should we
> require GemPixConvert.h to be added, or should it just be
> automatically included via GemPixUtil.h? I ask this because
> pix_2pdp.h includes GemPixObj.h, which includes GemPixUtil.h, but
> that's currently not including the new conversion files...
...nevermind: I came up with a fix that works fine here in gem and
with gem2pdp/pix_2pdp/pdp2gem...will commit it when I get home!
jamie
- Previous message: [GEM-dev] Re: [GEM-cvs] Gem/src/Base GemPixConvertAltivec.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvert.h, NONE, 1.1 GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp, NONE, 1.1 GemPixUtil.cpp, 1.48, 1.49 GemPixUtil.h, 1.46, 1.47
- Next message: [GEM-dev] GemPixConvert.h
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list