[GEM-dev] commit access for help files

[B. Bogart]

Although a lot of work I would say its better (if your going to start 
messing with Gem help patches at all) to convert them to the PDDP 
template... Of course there as still some issues with consistancy on 
platforms that need to be addressed first.

Anyhow my 2c

.b.

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

>
> I am working on the 5 part intro to Pd workshop outlined here:
>
> http://puredata.org/dev/pddp/IntroWorkshopSeries
>
> As I am doing that, I am going to be going thru the Gem docs a lot.   
> A lot of the Gem help patches are quite nice, like cube-help.pd with  
> the [pd gemwin] subpatch, and the clear format.  I'd like to fix some  
> of the others, like gemwin-help.pd, which are still quite raw.
>
> Should I just send updated versions to y'all, or commit them directly  
> (in which case I would need commit access)?  A lot of the time, it'll  
> be minor changes, like typos, small changes in working, etc.
>
> Also, I was thinking that [pd gemwin] should be an object rather than  
> a subpatch.  Its handy for normal Gem use.
>
> .hc
>
> ________________________________________________________________________ 
> ____
>
> If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
>                                                               -  
> Eldridge Cleaver
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev