[GEM-dev] Feature request: removing or renaming [counter]

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Aug 14 13:02:57 CEST 2006


Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> 
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> right.
>>> i once asked whether it was ok for everybody if i removed MarkEx from 
>>> Gem, but nobody but Hans replied.
>>
>> and speaking of removing: any objection to get rid of [gemorb], 
>> [gemtablet] and other input devices, which could be handled better by 
>> [hid] or such.
>>
>> i think [gemmouse] is fine, as it is bound to the window, but i have 
>> never tested [gemtablet] nor [gemorb]: for the former i guess that it 
>> emits absolute coordinates, so it is not (necessarily) bound to the 
>> gem-window, for the latter i don't know (but i guess it is the same)
> 
> I could never get [gemtablet] to work on Linux, so I wouldn't miss it.
> I use [gemmouse] a lot, also [gemkeyname], so please keep these. ;)
> 

i use them too.

i really just want to get rid of:
[gemtablet] and even more of [gemorb]

mfg.adsr
IOhannes




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list