[GEM-dev] motion blur

[chris clepper]

Try changing the GL_RGB to GL_RGBA in the snapMess() function in
pix_snap2tex.cpp and see what happens.

cgc

On 8/19/06, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
>
> Hallo,
> chris clepper hat gesagt: // chris clepper wrote:
>
> > On 8/19/06, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >Thanks for your help. I tried with the Cube now, so far only on my
> > >Matrox, where I get the same results: CPU usage goes up to 99-100
> > >percent immediatly. The patch seems to run fine otherwise...
> >
> >
> > Sounds like a Matrox problem.  On my nearly obsolete Powerbook the patch
> > takes under 3% CPU with the cube.  Your system might be downloading the
> > textures to the CPU for manipulation and then uploading them
> again.  This is
> > the same as using pix_snap followed by pix_texture.
>
> This sounds quite sensible. I now also tested the cube-version on my
> Intel-laptop. I also get very high load, though only about 80 percent)
> and crappy performance. Disabling the gemhead of the snap2tex lets CPU
> usage drop to about zero immediatly.
>
> Maybe it's a problem with the OpenGL libraries or with AGP on my
> systems. One is a Debian, the other an Ubuntu box, and I didn't do any
> special configuration.
>
> Maybe some other Debian/Linux users can give some hints here?
> IOhannes, you are running Debian as well, btu I guess with NVidia...
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20060819/12f1b9ba/attachment.htm>