[GEM-dev] motion blur

[chris clepper]

Yes, that mask is only for the depth buffer.  The mask for color and depth
would be 256 + 16384.

On 8/21/06, cyrille henry <cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr> wrote:
>
> I add the line :
>
>         post("mask %d, depth %d, current %d, color %d", mask,
> GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT, GL_CURRENT_BIT, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);
>
>
> and it gives me :
> mask 256, depth 256, current 1, color 16384
>
> looks OK.
> ???
>
> cyrille
>
> chris clepper a écrit :
> > On 8/21/06, *cyrille henry* <cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr
> > <mailto:cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr>> wrote:
> >
> >     well, if you see something, then it "work better"
> >     i think we have the same problem.
> >
> >     so, i think the gemglcleardeph and gemglclear does not only clear
> depth
> >     buffer, but also the color buffer.
> >     but i don't really see why, and how to solve this.
> >
> >
> > It works on both Nvidia and ATI on OSX, but not ATI on Windows.  The
> > code only clears the depth buffer, so I can't see what would trigger the
> > clearing of any other buffers.  Maybe the GLdefine constants are wrong
> > or there is an OR being done?  Try printing out GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT,
> > GL_CURRENT_BIT and GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT to the console.
> >
> > cgc
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEM-dev mailing list
> > GEM-dev at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20060821/ce123d54/attachment.htm>