[GEM-dev] continueRender weirdness?

[james tittle]

hi IO,

On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:18 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> however, i don't see any relation between a large model to be  
> loaded and the behaviour of continueRender().

...yeh, size was the most obvious difference at first...I've now  
tried it with the venus.obj and don't get the same behaviour, tho, so  
maybe it's a problem with the model in general?

> is there anything else in the patch where the continueRender()  
> might be called more often than once in a render cycle (esp.  
> [part_info] or [part_render])?

...no, this is just a "[gemhead]->[vertex_model]->[vertex_draw]"- 
kinda patch ;-)  I did notice that there were somethings that were  
multiple-y connected to inlets (ie. old chains that had been "short- 
circuited" from the gemhead without being removed from the latter  
active chain)...by this, I mean that I had a [vertex_program] between  
[gemhead] and [vertex_model], and to test it without  
[vertex_program], I just disconnected [gemhead]->[vertex_program] and  
connected [gemhead]->[vertex_model], but left [vertex_program] still  
connected to [vertex_model]'s inlet...doesn't seem like that should  
have any effect, right?

...anyway, this means I need to keep working on this stuff, anyway...

jamie