[GEM-dev] GemException changes not approved by MSVC 2003
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sun Sep 3 11:02:27 CEST 2006
chris clepper wrote:
> I haven't updated the Base classes in about two weeks and the change
> made to GemException has made MSVC very unhappy. It throws a warning
> about public std::exception for each and every class compiled. The
> warning is C4275: no dll-interface class 'exception' used as base for
> dll-interface class 'GemException'. Webpage here:
>
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3tdb471s.aspx
>
> I have no idea what this really means. MS doesn't have a runtime
> exception for use with DLLs? Should I just do the pragma to shut the
> warning off?
>
i think i'll revert the changes.
i introduced them in trying to solve a crash on debian systems whenever
an exception was thrown.
i tried to make GemExceptions as "standard" as possible.
it turned out to be a problem of the used stdlibc++ with the
nvidia-drivers, so my changes didn't help at all.
i thought that if they don't help, they won't hurt; obviously i was not
correct here.
mfg.adsr
IOhannes
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list