[GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems
nosehair911 at bellsouth.net
nosehair911 at bellsouth.net
Wed May 9 17:15:24 CEST 2007
I went to the "latest" folder and downloaded this one:
Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2-macosx104-powerpc.dmg
The build date is 9-May-2007. Is that the one I should have used?
Alain
>
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Date: 2007/05/09 Wed AM 11:14:37 EDT
> CC: Pure Data List <pd-list at iem.at>, gem-dev at iem.at
> Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems
>
> nosehair911 at bellsouth.net wrote:
> > Thats cool, I think thats an elegant solution. Then I dont get why I still get this message from Gem:
> >
> > [text2d]: Gem has been compiled without FONT-support !
> >
> > This is from the latest auto-build (may 9).
>
> which autobuild? currently there are several versions of pd-extended
> built each night, probably one of them uses the old non-font Gem?
>
> > Well I'm still very green at this, hope you can figure it out. I will keep testing the nightly-builds for
font
> > support. This process has been my first experience with compiling anything. BTW i was able to
get
> > text support going by including the static library within the Gem build. Gem blew up to 4.2MB, its a
> > fatty but it works for my purposes.
>
> well, that's the joy auf static linking (and that is one of the reasons
> why on w32 and os-x most apps are so huge, while on linux most of them
> are tiny)
>
> mfg.adr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list