[GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems

nosehair911 at bellsouth.net nosehair911 at bellsouth.net
Wed May 9 17:15:24 CEST 2007


I went to the "latest" folder and downloaded this one:

Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2-macosx104-powerpc.dmg

The build date is 9-May-2007.  Is that the one I should have used?
Alain

> 
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> Date: 2007/05/09 Wed AM 11:14:37 EDT
> CC: Pure Data List <pd-list at iem.at>,  gem-dev at iem.at
> Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems
> 
> nosehair911 at bellsouth.net wrote:
> > Thats cool, I think thats an elegant solution.  Then I dont get why I still get this message from Gem:
> > 
> > [text2d]: Gem has been compiled without FONT-support !
> > 
> > This is from the latest auto-build (may 9). 
> 
> which autobuild? currently there are several versions of pd-extended
> built each night, probably one of them uses the old non-font Gem?
> 
> > Well I'm still very green at this, hope you can figure it out.  I will keep testing the nightly-builds for 
font 
> > support.  This process has been my first experience with compiling anything.  BTW i was able to 
get 
> > text support going by including the static library within the Gem build.  Gem blew up to 4.2MB, its a 
> > fatty but it works for my purposes.
> 
> well, that's the joy auf static linking (and that is one of the reasons
> why on w32 and os-x most apps are so huge, while on linux most of them
> are tiny)
> 
> mfg.adr
> IOhannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 





More information about the GEM-dev mailing list