[GEM-dev] Gem/src/Pixes pix_record.h,1.9,1.10

chris clepper cgclepper at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 15:53:18 CEST 2007


On 10/5/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
>
> oops, seems like you haven't checked whether it still compiles after
> merging with my last commits (which basically were the same as the ones
> you committed; which resulted in double definitions within pix_record.h)


I don't have those duplicates here and it compiles fine.

i am still wondering what these new messages will do...no record backend
> uses it and i had to add the new variables to record.h (this is already
> in CVS).
> i guess you have some record*.cpp which do make use of the new stuff, so
> it would be interesting if you could commit those too :-)


These messages are specific to the work I do.  I don't expect anyone else to
find them useful but they don't affect anything if not used.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20071005/1cb76ff8/attachment.htm>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list