[GEM-dev] adding exemple to gem

[cyrille henry]

zmoelnig at iem.at a écrit :
> Quoting Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>:
>>> for stuff that has additional dependencies i would suggest to create a
>>> separate meta-directory parallel to the Gem-tree.
>>> (e.g. for gem+lua; gem+chaos,...)
>> I find it quite depressing that we can't get agreement on a standard
>> way to distribute and use libraries (aka externals).  This really
>> cripples the Pd community. Then we have to do things like organize
>> examples around why libraries might be used rather than the concepts
>> involved.
> 
> 
> that is why i was proposing to add a separate section for just this  
> kind of things.
> 
> i really don't want to tell people that they should use linux, or  
> pd-extended or whatelse, if all they want to do is use pd/Gem.
> 
> otoh there also should be a repository of more elaborate example  
> patches _too_.
> 
i'm not a big fan of externals.
So i think that elaborate exemple should not use externals.

for now, [any] is the only mandatory one. [list] should replace it, but for now it does not work.
so, i think i'll commit every patch that can be made without externals, and i'll wait for [list] to work for next exemple.

Cyrille


> mfgas.dr
> IOhannes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 
>