[GEM-dev] 2textures + gemframebuffer

cyrille henry cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr
Tue Apr 1 20:57:06 CEST 2008



marius schebella a écrit :
> Hi Cyrille,
> I am using a gem version from some days ago. were there any changes lately?
i was using a 1 month old Gem, and recompiling it today does change things.

> the patch you sent is only working for me, if I explicitely set the 
> pix_texture for shader1 and shader2 to mode 0, which I had to add to the 
> patch. for a help patch this should be included. (loadbang mode0).
ok.
mode 0 is the default here.
i just add this loadbang to the CVS example.

> I am using os x and ATI X1600 and this maybe defaults to rect mode??
> I am not sure what you mean with "everything working now". do you mean 
> you can have  11->12, 21->22, 31->32, or is it still 11->21, 12->22, 
> 33->32. (I think you know what I mean...).
yes, i can have 11-12 21-22 etc.

> because the first version (which I would think is correct) still does 
> not work for me.

could you please test the cvs version (of Gem and of the example) and tell me if it work?

cyrille

> marius.
> 
> 
> cyrille henry wrote:
>> hello,
>> well, difference is quite obvious, as the "not working" patch generate 
>> only a black windows.
>>
>> so, i just update and recompile gem, and i've got diferent result now.
>> in fact, everything work!
>>
>> sorry, i should have tested with latest build.
>>
>> so, i'll update the Gem example, in order to have the logic gemwin order.
>>  
>> cyrille
>>
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>>> cyrille henry wrote:
>>>> ok. here is a tar version (without the image).
>>> i have checked your original version (with the images; which i 
>>> received in your direct mail; the mail to the list got stuck because 
>>> of the size...).
>>> how obvious are the differences?
>>> i cannot really see a difference between the 2 results in 320x240; 
>>> there are however very subtle differences when i rescale the image to 
>>> 640x480.
>>>
>>> is that's how it is meant to be?
>>>
>>> mcg.adsr
>>> IOhannes
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 




More information about the GEM-dev mailing list