[GEM-dev] shall we release?
cyrille henry
cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr
Mon Apr 14 14:08:55 CEST 2008
hello,
"Release early, release often”
0.90 was release many years ago, so yes, i think release is a good idea.
Cyrille
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> even though i have already mentioned it in my emails regarding the w32,
> i would like to ask you what you all think of doing a 0.91 release of
> Gem within the next weeks.
>
> for me, the main reason to not release was, that there were no recent
> binaries for w32, and i have been unable to produce them for a while (i
> just gave up after 3 fruitless days several times). for whatever reasons
> i have been able to produce binaries, so we should use the opportunity:-)
>
>
> so far, nobody has yet complained about the w32 binaries i posted, so
> they seem to run stable.
>
> remaining issues are:
> - OSX: marius' reports of flickering (could you be a bit more specific
> as to what "flickering" means exactly?)
> - linux: crashes on window-close with intel-based gfxcards
> - linux: lqt backend of [pix_record] still crashes sometimes (i really
> suspect that it is lqt not fullfilling what it promises in the
> API-documentation)
>
> we probably could just release now (with these issues), and put out
> bugfix-releases once these issues are solved.
>
>
> mgfa.sdr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list