[GEM-dev] RGBA confusion...

[zmoelnig at iem.at]

Quoting Jack <jack at rybn.org>:

> Just for example, here is what i get when i open a simple image with
> Gem (without alpha) with a recent Pd-extended (20080524) and GEM:  ver:
> 0.91.0 'tigital' on PowerBook G4 (PowerPC) and MacOSX.4.11.

both screenshots are taken with 0.91.0?
it i think it works better with [pix_texture] :-)

> All  works
> fine with Pd-extended (20080315) and GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs. So i  only use
> this Pd and Gem now on my PowerPC.

so we probably should use this version for the binary release.
i forgot: how do i create a Gem.d_fat from a Gem.d_i386 and a Gem.d_ppc?

> I also send an email about a problem with [pix_mask] too.

that is why i started this whole thread...

fgmsad
IOhannes

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.