[GEM-dev] RGBA confusion...

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On May 28, 2008, at 9:22 PM, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:

> Quoting Jack <jack at rybn.org>:
>
>> Just for example, here is what i get when i open a simple image with
>> Gem (without alpha) with a recent Pd-extended (20080524) and GEM:   
>> ver:
>> 0.91.0 'tigital' on PowerBook G4 (PowerPC) and MacOSX.4.11.
>
> both screenshots are taken with 0.91.0?
> it i think it works better with [pix_texture] :-)
>
>> All  works
>> fine with Pd-extended (20080315) and GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs. So i   
>> only use
>> this Pd and Gem now on my PowerPC.
>
> so we probably should use this version for the binary release.
> i forgot: how do i create a Gem.d_fat from a Gem.d_i386 and a  
> Gem.d_ppc?

Add these to CFLAGS and LDFLAGS:

-arch ppc -arch ppc64 -arch i386

Remove "-arch ppc64" if you don't think a 64-bit build is safe.

.hc


>
>> I also send an email about a problem with [pix_mask] too.
>
> that is why i started this whole thread...
>
> fgmsad
> IOhannes
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,  
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better  
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne