[GEM-dev] RGBA confusion...
marius schebella
marius.schebella at gmail.com
Thu May 29 04:30:15 CEST 2008
hi iohannes,
not sure what exactly I should test. I would like to help you solve this
problem, and the easiest would be if you could provide a small test
series that includes all the things that have to be tested. I figure it
should contain pix_image, pix_film, pix_movie. but pix movie for example
still flickers and with pix_film I am not sure how to use it with
pix_mask. also, do you still need testing on pix_write and pix_record?
with/without alpha???
marius.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> as hinted in my last email, Gem seems to have different hardcoded ideas
> about what RGBA means (esp. on OSX)
>
> the main confusion is about which "type" to use:
> GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV vs GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8
> the solution seems to be simple (_REV on ppc, normal on i686) but it
> seems to be done inconsistently in the source code, thus resulting in
> all the alpha problems marius has reported.
>
> i have created a wiki-page that tries to explain the technical
> implementation of Gem's standard colorspaces, which can be found at
> http://gem.iem.at/documentation/GemWiki/ColorSpace
>
> i have filled this page to my best knowledge, but i would be glad if
> somebody who knows what they are doing could have a look at it and
> confirm (or correct) everything (esp. those lines marked with "?")
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list