[GEM-dev] "auto 1, 1"--[alpha] with double [gemhead] idiom

[Claude Heiland-Allen]

Hi Jack, all,

Moving the [alpha] later in the chain made no difference in my tests.

Attached are a pair of images to show the output with my setup.  Could 
this be a problem with the fglrx driver?

Thanks,


Claude

Jack wrote:
> The same patch using dynamic alpha (maybe better), sorry :)
> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> Le 3 juil. 08 à 01:11, Jack a écrit :
> 
>> Hello Claude,
>> Here a patch working.
>> I'm on macOSX on powerbook G4, with Pd version 
>> 0.40.3-extended-20080622 and GEM ver: 0.91.1 'tigital'
>> ++
>>
>> Jack<testAlpha.pd>
>>
>> Le 2 juil. 08 à 19:37, Claude Heiland-Allen a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The attached patch "double-gemhead-auto-alpha.pd" doesn't work as I 
>>> expect (I don't get any automatic depth sorting).  Is there any 
>>> suggested workaround for repetition with auto alpha depth sorting or 
>>> is this a bug in Gem?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Claude
>>> -- 
>>> http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: auto-alpha-1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 31084 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20080703/73932c4b/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: auto-alpha-2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32766 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20080703/73932c4b/attachment-0001.png>