[GEM-dev] pix_filmQT vs pix_filmDarwin on OSX?

chris clepper cgclepper at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 16:41:53 CET 2009


pix_filmDarwin is the one to use.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:42 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>wrote:

> what's the difference between pix_filmQT and pix_filmDarwin on OSX?
> it seems like pix_filmQT cannot open movie-files (here), wherease
> pix_filmDarwin works just fine.
>
> can therefore pix_filmQT be removed entirely?
> (on w32, pix_film+filmQT is used successfully anyhow; i think pix_filmQT
> originally came from the w32 implementation)
>
> mfg.adsfr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20090128/e2f401e1/attachment.htm>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list